Legal Opinion
Dayton Hudson Corp. v. Macerich Real Estate Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 4, 1987No. 85-1737PublishedCited by 188 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Circuit Judge.
Macerich Real Estate Company (Mace-rich) appeals from an order and judgment entered in favor of Dayton Hudson Corporation (DHC), appellee, and Fred Monsour (Monsour), intervenor appellee. The relevant undisputed facts may be briefly summarized.
On April 11, 1967, Monsour granted a ground lease to Macerich covering an 11.6 acre tract of land owned by Monsour. Macerich acquired the ground lease with the intent of constructing a building on the acreage and thereafter subleasing the building. Section 3 of the ground lease agreement provided, inter alia:
*1321(a) Tenant covenants…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Franks v. NimmoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Windon Third Oil And Gas Drilling Partnership v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Liberles v. County of CookCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Elizabeth BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by188 opinions
- Pizza Management, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Ritchie Enterprises v. Honeywell Bull, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Coffey v. Healthtrust, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Morrison Grain Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Maddy v. Vulcan Materials Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
183 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.