Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Stovall v. DVM Enterprises, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 31, 2003No. 88,657PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Davis, J.:

This is an appeal by the State of Kansas from a summary judgment granted in favor of DVM Enterprises, Inc. (DVM) and Daniel Thompson, M.D. The sole issue on appeal is whether the acts or practices of the defendants in selling controlled substances over the internet were unconscionable under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act (KCPA), K.S.A. 50-623 et seq. The district court concluded they were not and we affirm.

The Attorney General of Kansas filed suit under the KCPA against DVM; Daniel Thompson, M.D.; John Stiverson; and Home Prescription…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wille v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. International Petroleum Services, Inc. v. S & N Well Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  3. Waggener v. Seever Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. Gonzales v. Associates Financial Service Co. of Kansas, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  5. Willman v. EwenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Sierra BuildersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  2. Williamson v. AmraniSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. Dana v. Heartland Management Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
  5. Gonzalez v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API