Legal Opinion

Fourth National Bank of Tulsa v. Board of Com'rs

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 19, 1939No. 28249PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.

This is an appeal by the Fourth National Bank of Tulsa, Okla., a national banking association, defendant in the lower court, from a judgment of the district court of Tulsa county rendered against said bank and in favor of the board of county commissioners of Craig county and the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, a corporation, plaintiffs in the lower court, for the conversion of certain bonds. The plaintiffs in the lower court prosecute a cross-appeal.

Upon trial without a jury the district court first rendered judgment against said bank for the total par value of the bonds alleged to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. National Bank v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Queens County Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Rivers, Warehouse Commissioner v. Liberty National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  4. Bunting v. RicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1838
  5. Richardson v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estes v. ConocoPhillips Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. American Fidelity & Casualty Co., Inc. v. All American Bus Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  3. Bennett v. The Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  4. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a Corporation v. First National Bank and Trust Company of Tulsa, Okl., a National Banking AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
  5. Fidelity Deposit Co. of Maryland v. AthertonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API