Legal Opinion

Read v. Read

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 2002No. 92,930PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.

¶ 1 The dispositive issues 1 tendered for corrective relief on certiorari are (1) whether an earlier pronouncement by the Court of Civil Appeals in this case, 2 which affirmed the trial court’s denial of former husband’s motion to vacate the parties’ divorce decree, operates in a post-decree con tempt proceeding to bar relitigation of alleged jurisdictional defects in that decree, and (2) whether Read’s constitutional protection against double jeopardy was violated by the proceedings to hold him in contempt a second time. -We answer the first question in the affirmative and the second in the…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Justices of Boston Municipal Court v. LydonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fent v. Contingency Review BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  3. United States v. GallettiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Booth v. McKnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  5. State ex rel. Board of Regents ex rel. Campus Disciplinary Council v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API