Legal Opinion

Townsend v. Universal Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1937No. Appeal, 198PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The learned court below in this action of assumpsit sustained the position taken by the defendant in its affidavit of defense, that a good cause of action was not pleaded by plaintiffs, and accordingly entered judgment for defendant.

The plaintiffs in their statement of claim averred, inter alia, that the defendant issued a policy insuring them against legal liability as common carriers, by reason of fire, and other causes which have no relation to this litigation.

On March 13, 1935, the Tasty Baking Company delivered to plaintiffs certain merchandise to be transported…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. TerheydenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Rudman Et Ux. v. City of ScrantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. National Cash Register Co. v. AnsellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Stevens v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Peabody v. CarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Laursen v. GENERAL HOSP. OF MONROE CTY.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Arner v. SokolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Roth v. Golden Slipper Restaurant & Catering, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. United National Insurance v. M. London, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Frazier Et Ux. v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API