Koehring Company v. Ventresca
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The sole issue to be determined in this case of replevin for a clam-shell crane was one of title and right of possession. All extraneous matters may be treated as surplusage : Blossom Prod. Corp. v. Natl. Underwear Co., 325 Pa. 383, 387. Appellee claimed title under the terms of a bailment lease, and the right to possession because of appellant’s default. The latter did not simply deny this allegation generally, (for that would be insufficient, Jones et al. v. Dubuque F. & M. Ins. Co., 317 Pa. 144, 147), but specifically asserted title by virtue of a separate agreement of sale at a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Davis v. Investment Land Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Blossom Products Corp. v. National Underwear Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Ottman v. Nixon-NirdlingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Helfenstein v. Line Mountain Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Jones v. Dubuque Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- National Council of Junior Order of United American Mechanics of United States of North America v. ZytnickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Bacher v. City Nat. Bk., Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Roth v. Golden Slipper Restaurant & Catering, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Silberman v. CraneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Gensbigler v. ShawleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.