Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 9, 1933No. Appeals, 29 and 30PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

These two appeals, which grow out of one set of facts, raise the same questions of law and may conveniently be treated together. In both cases plaintiff appeals from the action of the court below in entering judgment for defendant for want of a sufficient statement of claim. The action was trespass to recover damages for the breach of an alleged contract to convey real estate. Affidavits of defense were filed raising questions of law upon which the court entered judgment in defendant’s favor.

In view of the disposition we are making of the case, we deem it unnecessary to consider…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. TerheydenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Hutchinson Baking Co. v. MarvelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sun Ray Drug Co. v. LawlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Arner v. SokolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Stevens v. Doylestown Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. National Cash Register Co. v. AnsellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Peabody v. CarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API