States v. Straughan
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT *
RABY, Senior Judge:
Appellant asserts six errors seeking relief concerning various allegations of multiplicity. In resolving these contentions, the numbers assigned to specifications and charges herein discussed refer to those specifications and charges as numbered in General Court-Martial [Promulgating] Order Number 39, Headquarters, 9th Infan*992try Division, Fort Lewis, Washington (19 Jul. 1984), and not as numbered in the appellate briefs.
Government appropriately concedes that certain of appellant’s assignments of error are correct. Accordingly, we will consolidate…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. HoltUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. DossUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. ZubkoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
- United States v. ZupancicUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. DemmerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. ColeyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. SchwarzU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. MorganU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. AndradeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.