Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Schwarz

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided July 17, 1987No. ACMR 8601024PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

RABY, Senior Judge:

Appellant asserts that all charges and specifications of which he was found guilty are multiplicious for sentencing purposes. We agree that Charge I and its Specification (drunk driving) is multiplicious for sentencing purposes with Charge III and its Specification (negligent destruction of government property). United States v. Williams, 19 M.J. 959 (A.C.M.R.1985). However, we are satisfied that none of the other offenses are so multiplicious. United States v. Abendschein, 19 M.J. 619 (A.C.M.R.1984), petition denied, 21 M.J. 84 (C.M.A.1985).

Appellant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States v. EshalomiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. HendonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  4. United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  5. United States v. McPhaulU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Woodrow John GrantIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. United States v. SmithArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  3. United States v. RobertsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API