Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Holt

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided October 24, 1983No. 44,833; CMR No. 23514PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

We granted review herein to determine whether charges alleging appellant’s various misuses of a military identification card with intent to deceive1 were encompassed within the several larceny charges,2 so as to require that the charges relating to the former be dismissed. See generally United States v. Doss, 15 M.J. 409 (C.M.A.1983), and United States v. Baker, 14 M.J. 361 (C.M.A.1983). To this end, the peculiar circumstances of this case led us to specify the following issues:

I

WHETHER ONE OFFENSE MAY BE SAID TO BE LESSER INCLUDED WITHIN ANOTHER…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. DossUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. HendricksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. MilesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  5. United States v. JeanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. United States v. TetersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  2. United States v. LloydCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  3. United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  5. United States v. RodriquezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API