Legal Opinion

Haddock v. Smithson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 21, 1976No. 763SC261PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

The sole question presented is: Did the trial court err in entering summary judgment as to defendant Smithson and the corporate defendant? We hold that it did.

Defendants are entitled to summary judgment if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, showed that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56. Summary judgment is an extreme remedy and is appropriate only where no genuine issue of material fact is presented. Long v. Long,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Kiser v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Long v. LongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Roberts v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Florida Patient's Comp. Fund v. TillmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Radford v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Emanuel v. Colonial Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Taylor v. Lutz-Yelton Heating & Air Conditioning Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API