Haddock v. Smithson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
The sole question presented is: Did the trial court err in entering summary judgment as to defendant Smithson and the corporate defendant? We hold that it did.
Defendants are entitled to summary judgment if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, showed that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56. Summary judgment is an extreme remedy and is appropriate only where no genuine issue of material fact is presented. Long v. Long,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Kiser v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Long v. LongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Roberts v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
3Cited by4 opinions
- Florida Patient's Comp. Fund v. TillmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Radford v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Emanuel v. Colonial Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Taylor v. Lutz-Yelton Heating & Air Conditioning Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979