Long v. Long
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
We are aware that summary judgment is an extreme remedy which should only be used where no genuine issue of material fact is presented, Kessing v. National Mortgage Corp., 278 N.C. 528, 180 S.E. 2d 823 (1971); and that it is generally conceded summary judgment will not usually be feasible in negligence cases where the standard of the prudent man must be applied, Pridgen v. Hughes, 9 N.C. App. 635, 177 S.E. 2d 425 (1970), and Robinson v. McMahan, 11 N.C. App. 275, 181 S.E. 2d 147 (1971), cert. denied 279 N.C. 395 (1971). The court’s sole function in ruling on a motion for summary…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Pridgen v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Lee v. ShorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baker v. MauldinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Goode v. Tait, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Haddock v. SmithsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976