Legal Opinion

Emanuel v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 1978No. 7716DC247PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Defendant contends first that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for plaintiff. We agree with this contention and in view of the discussion to follow on defendant’s other contention, no discussion on the first contention is necessary.

Defendant contends next that the trial court erred in denying its motion for summary judgment, arguing that the materials submitted to the court showed conclusively that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We disagree with this contention and hold that the materials…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Williams v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Penn v. Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Lutz-Yelton Heating & Air Conditioning Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. DeCarlo v. Gerryco, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. McAdams v. Union Security Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. McGee v. Colonial Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API