Legal Opinion

King v. National M. & E. Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1881PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Third District, Lewis and Clarke County.

1Opinion of the CourtGalbraith, J.

The record in this case discloses the fact that there was a trial to a jury, in which the plaintiff produced and examined witnesses in support of his complaint and presented his case. None of the evidence thus produced, however, appears in the transcript. The rec*2ord further discloses that thereupon a motion of non-suit was made and sustained. Although the appellant excepted to the action of the court in sustaining the motion of non-suit, he does not, as appears from his brief, insist or rely upon this exception to reverse the judgment. But this exception, even if insisted upon, unless the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Railroad Company v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Lawrence v. BallouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cruse v. FischlMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  2. State v. American Book Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Colonial & United States Mortgage Co. v. Northwest Thresher Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Harrigan v. Home Life Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Garfield M. & M. Co. v. HammerMontana Supreme Court · 1886

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API