Legal Opinion

Seelenfreund v. Terminix of Northern California, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 22, 1978No. Civ. 42454PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FEINBERG, J.

This case comes before us upon the sustaining of a demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend. Plaintiff in the court below has appealed from the judgment of dismissal thereupon entered.

In 1974, appellant hired respondent to make a termite inspection of certain premises that appellant was in the process of buying. The inspection and report were made in February 1974. Appellant then purchased the property. In February 1976, appellant had respondent make another termite inspection. This 1976 inspection disclosed a number of problems which had not been reported in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Twomey v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Collins v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Harrigan v. Home Life Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Krieger v. Nick Alexander Imports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Mills v. Forestex Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Leaf v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API