McEldowney v. Madden
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Modoc County and from an order denying the right to intervene. J. W-. Harrington, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY. C.
This is an appeal hy intervenor from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and from an order denying appellant the right to intervene. The respondents have filed no brief.
The plaintiff brought suit for four hundred dollars, money had and received, and caused a writ of attachment to b.e issued and levied on the property of defendant; the defendant demurred, and while such demurrer was pending the appellant ■asked leave to file a complaint in intervention, in which it is alleged that appellant had begun an attachment suit against the defendant Madden on a bond given hy him to the state of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kimball v. Richardson Kimball Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Coffey v. GreenfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Speyer v. Ihmels & Co.California Supreme Court · 1862
- Davis v. EppingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- J. H. Coghill & Co. v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
3Cited by7 opinions
- Potlatch Lumber Co. v. RunkelIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Moreland v. Monarch Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
- Commercial Savings Bank v. HornbergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Van Orden v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Takahashi v. KunishimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.