Legal Opinion

Takahashi v. Kunishima

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 28, 1939No. Civ. 2323PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAINES, J., protem.

Defendant Kunishima was, during the year 1937, engaged in raising farm produce in Imperial County and appellant Manos claims to have been the assignee of Manos Brothers, to whom Kunishima in December of that year is said to have executed a promissory note for $4,000 and interest, secured by a crop mortgage on a tomato crop then growing on Kunishima’s premises in that county, which mortgage is stated to have been in that month duly recorded. On July 12, 1938, respondent Takahashi commenced the instant action in the Superior Court of Imperial County against Kunishima to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex parte HollisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Hartman v. OlveraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Parker v. PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. J. H. Coghill & Co. v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  5. McEldowney v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Oksner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Turner v. EversAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1973
  3. Turner v. EversCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Hustead v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Bowie v. Union BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API