Legal Opinion

La Grenade v. Gordon

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 15, 1983No. 8221SC201PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

By her third assignment of error, plaintiff contends that the trial judge erred in granting defendants’ motion for directed verdict. On a defendant’s motion for directed verdict, all the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and a directed verdict may be granted only if when so viewed the evidence is insufficient to justify a verdict for the plaintiff. Manganello v. Permastone, Inc., 291 N.C. 666, 231 S.E. 2d 678 (1977). The moving party must state the specific grounds for his directed verdict motion, G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50(a), and our appellate…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. TilleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Tennessee-Carolina Transportation, Inc. v. Strick Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Feibus & Co., Inc. v. Godley Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McKenna v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re Epic Mortgage Insurance LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
  3. Leatherwood v. EhlingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Stacy v. Jedco Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  5. State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API