Stacy v. Jedco Construction, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, JOHN C., Judge.
Plaintiffs’ assignments of error and contentions focus on the second issue submitted to the jury; i.e., the issue of contributory negligence. By cross-assignments of error, defendant Jedco contends its motion for directed verdict should have been granted and the issue of its negligence should not have been submitted to the jury. For the reasons stated herein, we hold plaintiffs are entitled to a new trial on the issue of Mr. Purser’s contributory negligence.
I
A
Plaintiffs initially argue they were entitled to a directed verdict as to Jedco’s affirmative defense alleging…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Feibus & Co., Inc. v. Godley Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Chaffin v. BrameSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Feldman v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Bruce v. O'Neal Flying Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Jankee v. Clark CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- ESTATE OF SMITH, BY & THROUGH SMITH v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Godfrey v. Res-Care, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Trantham v. Michael L. Martin, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Leatherwood v. EhlingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.