Legal Opinion

State v. Tilley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 1977No. 86PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

Appellants’ first assignment of error relates to the admission in evidence of certain incriminating statements and actions which were made out of the presence of one or both of the defendants. Although defendants stress their absence on these occasions, we find this factor to be irrelevant to the determination of the admissibility of the challenged evidence. At the core of defendants’ objections is the hearsay rule. When declarations and acts intended as declarations are offered for the purpose of proving the truth of the matters asserted therein and depend for their…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  4. State v. CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API