St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. Peck
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court, Kingfisher County; A. H. Huston, Judge. Action by S. E. Peck against the St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
■Opinion by
HARRISON, C.
This suit was filed March 1909, by S. E. Peck against the St. Paul .Fire & Marine Insurance Company to recover on a $500 policy, wherein defendant insured a certain stallion against loss by lightning. The cause was tried April 10th, and judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff for $543. From this judgment and order overruling motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.
Several questions of error are assigned, the most material of which is that after the policy was issued, and without the knowledge or consent of the company and against the express provisions of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Carpenter v. Providence Washington InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Walsh v. . Hartford Fire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Atlas Reduction Co. v. New Zealand Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Draper v. MULLENNEXOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Niagara Fire Insurance Co. v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Humphrey v. Coquillard Wagon WorksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Bank of Buffalo v. VennSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.