Legal Opinion

St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. Peck

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 17, 1914No. 2267PublishedCited by 22 opinions

On rehearing. Mandate recalled, and judgment of the trial court for plaintiff, S. E. Peck, Former opinion overruled in part; see 37 Okla. 85, 130 Pac. 805.

1Opinion of the CourtLoofbourrow, J.

This suit was filed in the district court of Kingfisher county, Okla., in March, 1909, by S. E. Peck against the St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company to recover on a policy, wherein defendant insured a certain stallion against loss by lightning. The cause was tried April 10th, and judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff for $543. The plaintiff alleged the death of the horse by lightning, alleged a compliance with all the provisions of the policy and conditions precedent to an action, asked for judgment for $500, the face of the policy, and interest from the date of loss, and 'for an…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. The PalmyraSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Baker v. SmelserTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Taylor v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Heidenheimer & Co. v. L. A. & EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Rowland v. KreyenhagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Globe & Republic Insurance Co. of America v. Independent Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  2. Brown v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, ConnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Garland v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. City of Scottsdale v. KokaskaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. Egbert v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API