Legal Opinion
Payne v. Archer
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 26, 2000No. 93,908PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*329OPINION
COLBERT, J.
1 1 Charles Payne seeks review of an order of the three-judge panel affirming the trial court's denial of his request for an attorney fee for work done after his client's adjudication as permanently, totally disabled. The issue on review is whether the award Payne seeks is authorized by the statute in effect at the time of his client's injury. We conclude that such an award is authorized, reverse the panel's decision, and remand for the determination of a proper attorney fee.
12 Claimant, Terry L. Archer, suffered an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State ex rel. Department of Human Services ex rel. Jones v. BaggettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Conrad v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Special Indemnity Fund v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Special Indemnity Fund v. WeberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Bruner v. SobelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McQueen, Rains & Tresch, LLP v. CITGO Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Pinnacle Rehabilitation Hospital v. Rivera-VillarealCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
- McQueen, Rains & Tresch, LLP v. CITGO Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008