Legal Opinion

Bruner v. Sobel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 23, 1998No. 88236PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Justice.

¶ 1 The issue before us in this case is whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to appellee, Amanda So-bel, in this automobile accident/personal injury case on 'the basis the suit was barred by the two-year statute of limitation and in rejecting appellant, Christopher Bruner’s argument the “savings statute” found at 12 O.S. 1991, § 100 allowed him one year from dismissal of a timely brought prior suit to commence a new action against appellee. The rejection was based on the fact the original two-year limitation period had not yet expired at the time of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Irwin v. IrwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. Special Indemnity Fund v. ArcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Ross v. Kelsey Hayes, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. White v. HENG LY LIMSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  3. Ewing v. State, Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  4. Jeremy J. Hugus v. Brandon C. ReederWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Payne v. ArcherCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API