Bruner v. Sobel
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice.
¶ 1 The issue before us in this case is whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to appellee, Amanda So-bel, in this automobile accident/personal injury case on 'the basis the suit was barred by the two-year statute of limitation and in rejecting appellant, Christopher Bruner’s argument the “savings statute” found at 12 O.S. 1991, § 100 allowed him one year from dismissal of a timely brought prior suit to commence a new action against appellee. The rejection was based on the fact the original two-year limitation period had not yet expired at the time of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Irwin v. IrwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Special Indemnity Fund v. ArcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Ross v. Kelsey Hayes, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- White v. HENG LY LIMSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Ewing v. State, Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
- Jeremy J. Hugus v. Brandon C. ReederWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
- Payne v. ArcherCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.