Legal Opinion
Pinnacle Rehabilitation Hospital v. Rivera-Villareal
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided November 26, 2008No. 105,741. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DOUG GABBARD II, Presiding Judge.
T1 Petitioners, Pinnacle Rehabilitation Hospital 1 (Pinnacle) and Dr. Tanya Wash-burn (collectively, Providers) seek review of a workers' compensation court order denying recovery of attorney fees, costs, and prejudgment interest to Providers after they prevailed on their claim for payment for medical services provided to Claimant, Armando Rivera-Villareal. We sustain in part, reverse in part, and remand.
BACKGROUND
T2 In August 2004, Claimant, an oilfield worker, was injured as a result of a heat stroke while working for Longhorn Service Company (Employer). The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Abel v. TisdaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Arrow Tool & Gauge v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Kay v. Venezuelan Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Robert L. Wheeler, Inc. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Rout v. Crescent Public Works AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Oklahoma Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse v. PierceCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012