Legal Opinion

State v. Foster

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 21, 1996No. CM94-20807; CA A86963PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4)(d). He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence discovered following a routine traffic stop. We reverse.

On June 4, 1994, at approximately 1:55 a.m., defendant was a passenger in a car driven by Thompson. Officer Skinner stopped the car because it did not have a rear license plate light. Thompson did not have a driver’s license and told Skinner that defendant owned the car. Skinner subsequently learned from the police dispatcher that Thompson’s driver’s license was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. Dominguez-MartinezOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. State v. HerrinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. State v. AguilarOregon Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HadleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. State v. LantzschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. State v. Herrera-SorrosaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API