Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Depositors Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 21, 2000No. CO-00-519PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondent. He raises a variety of claims relating to fraud, racketeering, unfair trade practices, and racial and disability discrimination in connection with the cancellation of his automobile insurance policy. We affirm.

FACTS

In June 1990, appellant Joseph Dixon insured his home and automobile through respondent Depositors Insurance Company, a division of Allied Group Insurance. To obtain his automobile insurance policy, appellant stated that he was gainfully employed, he had not been in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. United States v. KragnessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  5. Nadeau v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. N.G.K.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  2. Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc. v. Transcontinental InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  3. Witzke v. Mesabi Rehabilitation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  4. Diana Delgado v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025
  5. Doe v. ReedDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API