Legal Opinion
Califano v. Moynahan
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 9, 1979No. 78-3420PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge.
Pursuant to a general order of the district court, specific types of cases were referred to the United States Magistrate who was thereby authorized to enter certain non-final orders. In the companion decision also decided today, Whitehead v. Califano, 596 F.2d 1315, we held that the magistrate’s orders, which remanded the cases to the Secretary for the taking of further evidence on the plaintiffs’ benefit claims, were not appealable.1 As an alternative avenue of relief, the Secretary has filed this petition for a writ of mandamus, directed to the district judge, to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Black v. BoydCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
- United States v. Honorable Frank J. Battisti, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Whitehead v. CalifanoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. ChoiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- United States v. John Leonard Ecker, A/K/A Leonard HoffeckerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- In Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Birchfield v. HarrisDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1980
- Califano v. MoynahanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.