Legal Opinion
United States v. Choi
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 11, 2011No. Magistrate 10-739-11PublishedCited by 119 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is the government’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus [64]. The government seeks a writ of mandamus to prevent Magistrate Judge John Facciola from considering selective or vindictive prosecution as either a defense to the merits of the prosecution of respondent Daniel Choi, or as the basis for a dismissal of the prosecution. Upon consideration of the Petition, the respondent’s Response thereto [70], the government’s Reply [82], and the oral argument of counsel, this Court will GRANT the Petition and issue a writ of mandamus…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- Atchison v. U.S. District CourtsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Nabaya v. DudeckDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Atchison v. U.S. District CourtsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- In re the Search of Information Associated with [redacted]@mac.com that is Stored at Premises Controlled by Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Barroca v. HurwitzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.