Legal Opinion
Birchfield v. Harris
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided November 25, 1980No. CIV-2-80-124PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEESE, District Judge.
The Court concluded that there was substantial evidence in the administrative record to support the finding of the defendant Secretary that the plaintiff Mr. Birchfield was not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act, and further that the required good cause had not been demonstrated by the plaintiff for a remand of this action to the defendant for the taking of additional evidence administratively. See memorandum opinion herein of October 22, 1980. In accordance therewith, judgment was entered, affirming the final decision of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bertha Carroll v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Califano v. MoynahanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Davis v. CalifanoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977
3Cited by9 opinions
- Frank Aubeuf v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Catherine SZUBAK, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- L.G. CAULDER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Brown v. SchweikerDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1983
- Czubala v. HecklerDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.