Barney v. Texarkana
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). The.decree of the chancery court was based upon a holding by the court that the plea of res judicata of the defendants should be sustained. It is elementary that all questions which might be litigated in an action of which the court has jurisdiction are res judicatae as to all parties thereto and their privies. The doctrine of res judicata is based on public policy, reason and experience. If all questions that have been decided by the court are to be regarded as still open for discussion and revision between the same parties and their privies, there…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Sauls v. FreemanSupreme Court of Florida · 1888
- Howard-Sevier Road Improvement District No. 1 v. HuntSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Townsend v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Stevens v. ShullSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nethercutt v. Pulaski County Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Robinson v. Missouri Pacific Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- Lightle v. KirbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Hammond v. KirbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Wilson v. Dyess Farms, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.