Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Dyess Farms, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided January 3, 1948No. Civil Action No. J-295PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TRIMBLE, District Judge.
On June 6, 1934, plaintiffs by a quitclaim deed to the Arkansas Rural Rehabilitation Corporation conveyed to it a large body of land in Mississippi County, Arkansas, a portion of which is involved in this action. By mesne conveyances the defendant Dyess Farms, Inc., became the title holder, and now holds title subject to a mortgage to the United States. All of the lands conveyed were delinquent in improvement districts. These delinquencies were compromised and paid by the grantee and it received quitclaim deeds from the districts.
On March 6, 1935, the grantee filed in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Fayerweather v. RitchSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Werlein v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Pearce v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ward v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Wells v. NoeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1965