Legal Opinion

Townsend v. McDonald

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 5, 1931PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, C. J.

Wallace Townsend, for himself and other legal voters, seeks by mandamus to compel Ed. F. McDonald, as Secretary of State, to file a petition for a referendum on act 345 passed by the last Legislature. Act 345 is entitled “An act to provide for the creation of county boards of election commissioners and the appointment of election judges and clerks.” Acts of 1931, p. 1117. The Secretary of State refused to file the petition because there was not a full and correct copy of the act attached to it.

Our Initiative and Referendum Amendment to tile Constitution was adopted at the general election in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. OlcottOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Chesshir v. CopelandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  3. Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Leigh v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  2. Bailey, Lieutenant-Governor v. AbingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  3. Reeves v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  4. Phillips v. RothrockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  5. Kyzar v. City of West MemphisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API