Lightle v. Kirby
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Street Improvement District No. 6 of the city of Searcy includes within its boundaries a portion of a street which is a part of the State Highway System, and on that account the improvement district received a contribution from the state of Arkansas under the provisions of act No. 11 of the Acts of the Special Session of 1934, p. 28.
Margaret Lightle owns lots in the improvement district abutting the state highway, and when the contribution to the improvement district was made she brought suit against the commissioners of the district, praying that they be required to devote the contribution…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Howard-Sevier Road Improvement District No. 1 v. HuntSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Stevens v. ShullSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Tri-County Highway Improvement District v. Vincennes Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Jackson v. FosterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- Barney v. TexarkanaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ross v. Arkansas Communities, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Connor v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- Mixon v. Barton Lumber & Brick Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Continental Casualty Co. v. HuizarTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Continental Casualty Co. v. HuizarTexas Supreme Court · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.