Legal Opinion
Underwood v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided September 30, 1994No. S-5802PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Chief Justice.
At issue in this appeal is the constitutionality of a 1992 amendment to the permanent fund dividend (PFD) • statutes, Chapter 4, section 4, SLA 1992. The amendment changed the qualifying date set forth in AS 43.23.005(a) for a 1993 PFD. Charles E. Underwood, Jr., along with his wife and son, Susie G. Underwood and Anthony C. Underwood (the Underwoods), allege that they were unlawfully denied 1993 PFDs as a result of the change. They instituted this action against the State of Alaska, Governor Walter J. Hickel and the Department of Revenue (collectively “the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. EricksonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Isakson v. RickeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Alaska Pacific Assurance Co. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. OstroskyAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- State, Department of Revenue, Permanent Fund Dividend Division v. CosioAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Heller v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Church v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Wilkerson v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Harrod v. State, Dept. of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.