Legal Opinion
State v. Reichenberg
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided April 10, 1996No. 22350PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILAK, Justice.
Appellant Brenda Lynn Reichenberg (Rei-chenberg) appeals from the district court’s order affirming the magistrate’s denial of a motion to dismiss a charge of Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol (DUI) as impermissible under the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, art. I, § 13 of the Idaho Constitution, and I.C. § 18-301 (repealed, 1995). We affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On December 20, 1994, Reichenberg was arrested by a Nampa City Police Officer on a DUI charge pursuant to I.C. § 18-8004. At the request of the arresting…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. CowenIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. FerreiraIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
- Marshall v. Idaho Department of TransportationIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. BushIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- Head v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Berglund v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.