State v. Bush
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SILAK, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction and sentence after a jury found appellant Daniel Bush (Bush) guilty of forcible sexual penetration by use of a foreign object, an infamous crime against nature and lewd conduct with a minor child under the age of sixteen. We affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On May 3, 1995, fifteen-year old J.S. was living with his mother, B.S., at their residence in McCammon, Idaho, where they had lived for the previous five years. J.S. was awakened on that morning at approximately 4:00 a.m. He turned on the light and saw a man standing in…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. ZichkoIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. RaudebaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Perry v. Magic Valley Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. HumpherysIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. WoodNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. PageIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.