Berglund v. Potlatch Corp.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSilak, Justice
This is an appeal from an Industrial Commission (Commission) decision, which was rendered after a hearing and post-hearing brief. After the hearing to determine Fred Berglund’s (Berglund) eligibility for benefits, but before the Commission reached a decision, Berglund was convicted under Idaho Code section 41-1325 of providing false information to an insurer. Subsequently, the Commission ruled that Berglund was not a credible witness, had not been involved in a work-related accident and had forfeited his right to compensation. The Commission also required Berglund to repay Potlatch…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Garcia v. STATE TAX COM'N OF STATE OF IDIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Steen v. Denny's RestaurantIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Buell v. Idaho Department of TransportationIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
- Cheung v. Wasatch ElectricIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Nelson v. Lake View Bible ChapelIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.