Legal Opinion

Berglund v. Potlatch Corp.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1996No. 22718PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSilak, Justice

This is an appeal from an Industrial Commission (Commission) decision, which was rendered after a hearing and post-hearing brief. After the hearing to determine Fred Berglund’s (Berglund) eligibility for benefits, but before the Commission reached a decision, Berglund was convicted under Idaho Code section 41-1325 of providing false information to an insurer. Subsequently, the Commission ruled that Berglund was not a credible witness, had not been involved in a work-related accident and had forfeited his right to compensation. The Commission also required Berglund to repay Potlatch…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Garcia v. STATE TAX COM'N OF STATE OF IDIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Steen v. Denny's RestaurantIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Buell v. Idaho Department of TransportationIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Cheung v. Wasatch ElectricIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Nelson v. Lake View Bible ChapelIdaho Supreme Court · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API