Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Trapp v. Hancuh

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 22, 1998No. C2-98-830PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

In this fifth appeal arising from a loan transaction between business partners, James Trapp disputes three components of the calculation of prejudgment interest: the starting date, the ending date, and the interest rate. Lowell Hancuh and Han-cuh’s company, AAA Wholesale Trucks, Inc. (collectively Hancuh), appeal the denial of prejudgment interest on the remaining principal of a usurious loan. We find no reversible error in the calculation and affirm.

FACTS

This litigation, generated by the partnership between Trapp, Hancuh, and a third person, has greatly exceeded the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Specialized Tours, Inc. v. HagenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Imlay v. City of Lake CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. ICC Leasing Corp. v. Midwestern MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Duxbury v. Spex Feeds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  2. In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage LitigationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Arthur Allen Hogenson v. Michael W. HogensonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  4. In re the Estate of RuttCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  5. John S. Drewitz v. Motorwerks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API