Legal Opinion

Crouch v. Central Labor Council

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1930PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, C. J.

Attorneys in this case are to be commended for stipulating the facts. The law is well settled that when the facts are stipulated the court is bound by them, and the case must be decided upon said facts and such other evidence as may be adduced. The exhibits consist of a copy of a form for an agreement which pliantiff refused to sign and a copy of the Oregon Labor Press showing the objectionable matter complained of by plaintiff. In the instant case no other evidence was adduced except said exhibits.

We need not look further than the Oregon Reports for authority that laborers may organize to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Longshore Printing Co. v. HowellOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Greenfield v. Central Labor CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Lloyd Corporation v. WhiffenOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. General Electric Co. v. WattleOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. In Re Hearings Concerning Canon 35Supreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  4. Geo. B. Wallace Co. v. International Ass'n of MechanicsOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Hotel & Restaurant Employees v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API