Legal Opinion
Lloyd Corporation v. Whiffen
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 9, 1989No. CC A8512-08127; CA A38839; SC S35170PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*677JONES, J.
The issue is whether the owner of a privately owned shopping center open to the public for commercial purposes may obtain a declaration of rights and an injunction against persons entering the shopping center to obtain petition signatures; or whether the defendant-solicitors have a right to solicit petition signatures in the shopping mall without plaintiffs permission.
The circuit court ordered that “defendants are hereby restrained and enjoined from entering upon plaintiffs private property to exercise their expressions of opinion or to gather signatures in the initiative and…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bell v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Southcenter Joint Venture v. National Democratic Policy CommitteeWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
- West v. Thomson NewspapersUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Eastwood Mall, Inc. v. SlancoOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Lloyd Corporation v. WhiffenOregon Supreme Court · 1993
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.