Legal Opinion
Greenfield v. Central Labor Council
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 1, 1920PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohns, J.
The vital question presented is the application, construction and constitutionality of Chapter 346, Laws of 1919, the material portions of which are copied in full in the companion case of Heitkemper et al. v. Central Labor Council et al.
The plaintiff is the moving party, and it was for him to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the picketing was not. done in a peaceful or lawful manner. His proof as to the manner and method of picketing appears from the affidavits of Frances Grant, I. M. Banks, E. H. Carpenter, H. W. Harper, E. L. Lynch, E. Weygandt, all of whom are employees of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- J. F. Parkinson Co. v. Building Trades CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Iron Molders' Union No. 125 of Milwaukee v. Allischalmers Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1908
- State v. FinchOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. CochranOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Tri-City Central Trades Council v. American Steel FoundriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Jeffery-De Witt Insulator Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Fenske Bros. v. Upholsterers International Union of North America, Local No. 18Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Marathon Electric Manufacturing Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Geo. B. Wallace Co. v. International Ass'n of MechanicsOregon Supreme Court · 1936
- Crouch v. Central Labor CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1930
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.