Legal Opinion

Longshore Printing Co. v. Howell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1894PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Appeal from Multnomah: Loyal B. Stearns, Judge. The. plaintiff was incorporated on March twenty-first, eighteen hundred and ninety-one, and is engaged in the business of lithographing, engraving, printing, and publishing journals, newspapers, etc. The Multnomah Typographical Union is an unincorporated voluntary association, of which the defendant George Howell is president.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Multnomah: Loyal B. Stearns, Judge. The. plaintiff was incorporated on March twenty-first, eighteen hundred and ninety-one, and is engaged in the business of lithographing, engraving, printing, and publishing journals, newspapers, etc. The Multnomah Typographical Union is an unincorporated voluntary association, of which the defendant George Howell is president. The defendants J. M. Maxwell, John Rhodes, Nat L. Cassady, J. C. Gallagher, M. Goughler, L. B. Johnson, and Hugh Glen are members of the present, executive committee, of which Maxwell is chairman, and E. De Yarmand, L.…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Wolverton.

1. The questions presented for our consideration arise upon demurrer to the complaint, and hence all the allegations contained therein must be taken as true. This rule *536must be understood, however, to include only such allegations as contain statements of facts as distinguished from statements of conclusions of fact or of law. It is a well settled rule of pleading that bare allegations of conclusions cannot avail the pleader, especially where a demurrer is interposed, without a statement of the probative facts upon which said conclusions are based. Even then the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Carew v. RutherfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. Toledo, A. A. & N. M. Ry. Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1893
  4. Bohn Manufacturing Co. v. HollisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. Arthur v. OakesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Pattern Makers' League v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Karges Furniture Co. v. Amalgamated Woodworkers Local Union No. 131Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. O'Hara v. ParkerOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Brown & Allen v. Jacobs' Pharmacy Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Aetna Insurance v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API