Baum v. County of Whatcom
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Whatcom County. — Hon. JET. E. Hadley, Judge.
1Per curiam
The defendant let a contract to one Moran for the construction and improvement of a county road. The contract provided that the contractor should •execute a bond containing the provisions of § 2415, 1 Hill’s Code (Bal. Code, § 5925). A bond was executed accordingly, but contained a recital that it was executed as a ■common law bond, and not in pursuance of the statute .aforesaid, and also that under the decisions of the supreme •court it was not required to take a bond to secure the per.formance of the contract, etc. The plaintiff furnished supplies to the contractor for his use in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sears v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fidelity Deposit Co. of Baltimore, Md. v. RainerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Gary Hay Grain Co., Inc. v. CarlsonMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Pacific Bridge Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
- McDonald v. DaveyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.