Legal Opinion
McDonald v. Davey
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 18, 1900No. 3279PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County. — Hon. Leandek H. Prather, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Reavis, J.
In December, 1895, one Chapman was receiver of the Consolidated Bonanza Mining & Smelting Company, a corporation, and entered into a lease with one Davey under the terms of which Davey was to operate the mine and pay to Chapman one dollar per ton on all ore shipped. There were a number of stipulations in the contract of lease, one of which provided that Davey should operate the mine in a minerlike manner, keep the same well timbered, and separate the ore that was not shipped by him on the dump from refuse matter, pay all debts that he might…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Bartelt v. LiebesWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Sears v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Baum v. County of WhatcomWashington Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fidelity Deposit Co. of Baltimore, Md. v. RainerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Brown Bros. v. Columbia Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Rust v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Forsyth v. New York Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.