Legal Opinion

Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. National Surety Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1916No. 12944PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered June 5, 1915, in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on an indemnity bond, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Respondent brought this action against appellant to recover the purchase price of powder furnished by *228respondent to the Keasel Construction Company, which had a contract with the Puget Sound & Willapá Harbor Company for the construction of thirteen miles of railroad in Pacific county. The railway company took from the construction company a bond with the appellant as surety, conditioned that the' construction company would faithfully perform the contract and pay all claims for labor, materials, supplies, etc. The bond was not filed for record in Pacific or any other county. The construction…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tsutakawa v. KumamotoWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Armour & Co. v. Western Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State ex rel. Bartelt v. LiebesWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Pacific Bridge Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. McDonald v. DaveyWashington Supreme Court · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fidelity Deposit Co. of Baltimore, Md. v. RainerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Finkelberg v. Continental Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Horstmann Co. v. WatermanWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Brower Co. v. Noise Control of Seattle, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Forsyth v. New York Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API