Legal Opinion

Russell v. Royal MacCabees Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 7, 1998No. 1 CA-CV 97-0157PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PATTERSON, Judge.

¶ 1 Stephen T. Russell (appellant) appeals from summary judgment permitting Royal Maccabees Life Insurance Company (Royal) to rescind appellant’s disability insurance policy because of an alleged misrepresentation in the policy application. Finding a genuine issue of material fact, we reverse and remand.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 We state the facts in a light most favorable to appellant. Griffith v. Faltz, 162 Ariz. 599, 599, 785 P.2d 119, 119 (App.1990). In July 1980, appellant was arrested and charged with felony insurance fraud and felony theft. As a result…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In Re PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Opdyk v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. People v. MajadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. James River Insurance v. Hebert Schenk, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Parsons v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  3. Jackson v. Hartford Life and Annuity Ins. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  4. State v. ZAPUTILCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. State of Arizona v. Raymond Anthony HallCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API