Legal Opinion

People v. Majado

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 1937No. Crim. 422PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The defendant was found guilty, under section 270 of the Penal Code, of failure to' provide for a minor child. He was sentenced to two years in a county industrial road camp, which was suspended on condition that he pay $12.50 per month for the support of the child, and this appeal followed.

The only question raised is whether the court erred in admitting in evidence the record of appellant’s former conviction of a similar offense in connection with the- same child, and in sustaining an objection to the appellant’s offer to deny that he was the father of the child. It appears that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. HainlineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. IngenitoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. Maria Garcia-Gonzales v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  5. People v. BeltranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API