Legal Opinion

Southern Photo & Blue Print Co. v. Gore

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1938PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeHaven

Complainants seek by their bill herein to recover certain contributions assessed against them by defendants under the Unemployment Compensation Law of Tennessee, chapter 1, Public Acts, First Extraordinary Session 1936, as amended by chapter 128, Public Acts 1937, and paid by them under protest. It is charged that the act is unconstitutional for reasons hereinafter appearing.

The assessments in question are those for the first six mo,nth,s of 1937.

Complainants are two limited partnerships doing business in the city of Chattanooga. The Southern Photo & Blue Print Company was organized on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Southern Express Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Koen v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Mengel Box Co. v. FowlkesTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Lamb v. WhitakerTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Waldauer v. BrittonTennessee Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gibson Products Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Rozran v. DurkinIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  3. In Re Mid America Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1939
  4. Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital Authority v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Harris v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API