Legal Opinion
Gibson Products Co. v. Murphy
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 27, 1940No. 29366PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
Plaintiffs in error have appealed from adverse judgments in two actions instituted to recover payments made as required by the Oklahoma Unemployment Compensation Act. Chapter 52, S. L. 1936-37, p. 30, Title 40, ch. 6, Okla. Stats. Anno.
Plaintiffs are separate corporations controlled by the same officers and directors. As provided in the act, plaintiffs were found to be an employing unit. (Subdivision (f) 4, sec. 19.) Contributions or payment of taxes as ordered were made under protest. The facts are not disputed. The controversy is limited to the constitutionality of the act.
It is first…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Underwood Typewriter Co. v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 347 State Question No. 639Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Application of Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 382Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- New Haven Metal & Heating Supply Co. v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Gilbert v. Security Finance Corp. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.